| Analysis of New Direct Tax Code - Discriminatory MAT rates proposed. |
| Saturday, 29 August 2009 12:45 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Submitted by By Nitesh Bhandari, Articled Assistant I would like to give my opinion on some of the provision contained in the new direct tax code. They are as follows: With reference to the provisions related to the Minimum alternative Tax contained in the draft of the New Direct Tax Code, the MAT tax base is expected to increase manifold. The code if cleared without modification would impose MAT at a rate of 2% (0.25% for any banking companies) of gross block of assets including the capital work in progress and book value any other assets after netting off the amount of accumulated depreciation and debit balance of Profit & Loss account if included in the gross block of the assets. This implies that bigger the size of the balance sheet, the higher the amount of Minimum Alternate tax to be paid. This signifies that the capital Intensive companies (Power, Infrastructure, Oil & Gas) might have to pay higher taxes even in case of poor performance. And companies will have to pay taxes even if they are in pre-operative stage, where they have made investments but are yet to generate revenue. This will de-motivate promoters from investment in projects which take longer time to start production. To further worsen the ahead the carry forward option of credit of taxes paid as MAT is also proposed to be withdrawn. On the contrary, in the service sector where capital investment in not on the higher side might have a benefit from this as in the initial times where the companies are still in the loss making stage might not be burdened with MAT. To be precise this provision will de-motivate Indian companies from heavy Capital & R&D expenditure and also might lead companies to lower their already penned capex plans. For Example if we go by NHPC Limited's financial which recently hit the market with its IPO they might have tough time ahead as this code comes into effect. A small analysis with the numbers is given below
This clearly sends out a message that the more you invest in business the more the tax you will have to pay to the government. It unjustifiable to tax the company based on their assets rather than the profits. In current times when India wants to bring in more of investment this will prove to be of lot of disappointment for the government. This will lead to more of investments flowing out of India into China and many other countries where the state is giving number of privileges to the investors. Comparison of number for some other companies
This provision might put the reality companies under more pressure and also is partial to service sector or to the sectors where capital requirement is on the lower side. This MAT provision looks more to be on lines of Wealth Tax where NET assets are taxed but here GROSS assets are charged. In case of companies with more number of subsidiary companies, they will have to pay more taxes. Assume “A” is the holding company for “B” and “B” is the holding company of “C” and “C” is another holding company of “D” and so on. The holding company “A” will have INVESTMENT amount in “B” on their asset side and “B” will have yet another amount of Investment in “C” appearing on their balance sheet. This means that there will be double taxation within the country, whereas the government states that it wants to reduce double taxation among countries. I feel that this important aspect has not been noticed or debated much, so far by the corporate sector of the country for whom it will have major adverse impact. With regards to the shift from Exempted – Exempted – Exempted [EEE] model to the Exempted – Exempted – Taxed [EET] model, people especially senior persons who have made investments based on tax free returns will be impacted. Insurance sector is said to be the backbone of the economy and if the returns at the end of the term of investment are taxed will de-promote savings in insurance also having in view the lower rate of return involved in it. So in the nation’s interest at least Insurance should remain under the EEE model. Compiled by Nitesh Bhandari (SRO -0256796) CA PCC – Student +91-98413-98822 E – Mail: fca_nitesh@yahoo.in |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||